Well deserved, and a good choice. The time-consistency of monetary policy stuff is absolutely fundamental: it sets out the credibility and consistency problems in a uniquely insightful and powerful way. The real business cycle stuff is inadequate as a theory of depressions, but very interesting and powerful as a theory of booms.
Still, were I in charge, I would have given the Sargent-Barro Nobel Prize before this one...
Posted by DeLong at October 11, 2004 10:40 AM | TrackBackPress Release: The Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 2004: The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has decided to award the Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel, 2004, jointly to Finn E. Kydland (Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh and University of California, Santa Barbara, USA) and >
Edward C. Prescott (Arizona State University, Tempe, and Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, USA) "for their contributions to dynamic macroeconomics: the time consistency of economic policy and the driving forces behind business cycles".
Good to see some solid work win. Sargeant-Barro- not until we forgive Barro his intro textbook.
Posted by: AllenM at October 11, 2004 11:42 AMI was kind of hoping that Paul Krugman would win this time. What a slap in the face that would be for the Bush administration.
Posted by: erg at October 11, 2004 12:24 PMIts not a nobel prize though. Alfred Nobel didn't endow it :-) Its the 'Swedish Central Bank Prize in Honour of Alfred Nobel' as Nassim Taleb points out in his 'Fooled by Randomness'. next thing you know people will be claiming that Economics is a science.... ;-p
Dermot
Posted by: dermot at October 11, 2004 12:39 PMI'm really glad Prescott won. He was at the University of Minnesota for a long time -- my alma mater. I was in the business school, though, not the economics department. It's too bad I never had a class w/him.
Anyway, I'm just really glad that Paul Krugman didn't win. Deo gratias! The Nobel committee gets to keep its integrity for at least a little while.
Posted by: Inquisitor Generalis at October 11, 2004 12:39 PMPretty good, but are they line for the Ki'q Y'gs'Othoth Prize for Advancing Shrillness?
Posted by: ogmb at October 11, 2004 01:23 PMAlthough I'm the biggest Star Trek fan I know, my Klingon is a little weak. What does Ki'q Y'gs'Othoth mean, ogmb?
Posted by: James S. W. at October 11, 2004 01:32 PMAlthough I'm the biggest Star Trek fan I know, my Klingon is a little weak. What does Ki'q Y'gs'Othoth mean, ogmb?
Posted by: James S. W. at October 11, 2004 01:34 PMAlthough I'm the biggest Star Trek fan I know, my Klingon is a little weak. What does Ki'q Y'gs'Othoth mean, ogmb?
Posted by: James S. W. at October 11, 2004 01:35 PMIt's not supposed to be Klingon, but one of the fake languages from H. P. Lovecraft's horror stories. No meaning.
I would have preferred a Sargent-Prescott-Barro prize. I don't see why Stiglitz-Akerlof-Spence had to share whilst Sargent and Barro will one day get their own separate prizes for work which is arguably really part of the same project.
I'm surprised that no newspaper has yet described Prescott's theory of business cycles in concise vernacular terms yet. You know the way they wrote up Tobin's Nobel with a line such as "James Tobin received the Nobel Prize today for his theory that you shouldn't put all your eggs into one basket." If it were for Prescott they'd have to say something like "Ed Prescott received the Nobel Prize today for his theory that recessions and depressions are caused by sudden desires of workers to take time off (also known as 'taste shocks' in the economists' jargon)."
If they did it might go something like this:
Posted by: zzi at October 11, 2004 01:48 PMzzi you beat me to it. I would have the press describe Prescotts work thus.
"Ed Presscott recieved his Nobel Prize today for explaining why workers took a long vacation during the Great Depression."
I
Posted by: Lawrence at October 11, 2004 02:32 PMwhen I was in econ grad school in the 90s Ed Prescott came for a seminar and we were all quite impressed. One of us was so moved to write "Ed Prescott -- economist of the '90s" on the chalkboard in the TA offices. That sparked a long chalkboard (pre-email chat blathering, I guess) about who was the true "economist of the 90s." I don't remember Finn Kydland's name coming up. But our macro classes were somewhere between horrible and worse than horrible, so we were (and presumably are still) pretty clueless on the matter.
I was rooting for Oliver Williamson.
Posted by: jojo at October 11, 2004 03:20 PMI fully support zzi who says the prize should have gone to Sargent-Prescott-Barro. Stiglitz and Akerlof should have been awarded in the past separately too. And don't forget Bhagwati's major contributions to trade theory came decades earlier than the Kydland-Prescott paper. It would have been more fitting if the award had gone to Krugman-Bhagwati-Dixit this time. But the Swedish central bank, like probably all central banks, is full of conservatives/libertarians. Can't expect them to get rid of their inherent systemic bias.
Posted by: sainlob at October 11, 2004 04:14 PMYou are very polite Brad. I guess all econmists agree that the paper on subgame imperfection of monetary policy is, indeed, very important. I don't believe that you believe that RBC theory is useful for understanding booms. I certainly don't but let's debate by e-mail.
My problem with a prize for Prescott is that, although he has done enough good work for a prize, his worst work is aweful. I think, for example, that you consider the same person worthy of a Nobel prize and to have failed the Turing test.
A Sargent Barro prize ?!? I can see giving both the prize, but not together. I think their work overlaps only in the very silly interest in the Lucas supply function. Barro has done good empirical stuff on Growth and Sargent has done interested stuff on models with learning but the overlap of their work is no good (so the citation would be a crazy assertion).
But mainly I suspect your diplomacy is part of a strategy to unite economists right and left against Bush.
By the way. Odd that Michael Froomkin and Martin Feldstein have the same initials.
Posted by: Robert Waldmann at October 11, 2004 06:44 PMYou are very polite Brad. I guess all econmists agree that the paper on subgame imperfection of monetary policy is, indeed, very important. I don't believe that you believe that RBC theory is useful for understanding booms. I certainly don't but let's debate by e-mail.
My problem with a prize for Prescott is that, although he has done enough good work for a prize, his worst work is aweful. I think, for example, that you consider the same person worthy of a Nobel prize and to have failed the Turing test.
A Sargent Barro prize ?!? I can see giving both the prize, but not together. I think their work overlaps only in the very silly interest in the Lucas supply function. Barro has done good empirical stuff on Growth and Sargent has done interested stuff on models with learning but the overlap of their work is no good (so the citation would be a crazy assertion).
But mainly I suspect your diplomacy is part of a strategy to unite economists right and left against Bush.
By the way. Odd that Michael Froomkin and Martin Feldstein have the same initials.
Posted by: Robert Waldmann at October 11, 2004 06:53 PMI will probably go against current here, but "Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations" is a very important piece of work on the business cycle (don't get me wrong, I also find the time inconsistency paper very insightful).
Its most valuable and important contribution is to provide a method to study the businss cycle. The main element of this method is the use of dynamic, stochastic, general equilibrium (DSGE) models. I would rather call this method the DSGE method than the RBC method.
That said, I suspect that technology shocks are important components of the business cycle, but that they are not the full story. Clearly, there is a large and growing literature that uses DSGE models to study other sources of the business cycle (including money shocks). DSGE models are also used to study other aspects of the economy. For example, Prescott used a DSGE model to study asset returns. The result is a very important paper titled "The Equity Premium: A Puzzle."
Brad wrote that RBC theory may be a good theory of booms, but a poor theory of depressions. Prescott might also agree, especially if we define a depression as a very severe and prolonged recession. In response to this, Prescott and the Minnesota gang held a conference on depressions. The papers of this conference appear in the January 2002 issue of the Review of Economic Dynamics.
http://www.economicdynamics.org/RED135.htm
I agree that the shift from studying examples with closed from solutions to simulating is very useful.
My objection to DSGE models is not just the fact that "Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations" considers only technology shocks (and assumes the Solow residual is technology). Even with sticky prices and wages and involuntary unemployment, the contribution of the models is the imposition of incredibly strong rationality assumptions which no one believes. From that paper on it seems to me that parameter estimates allegedly based on micro data are chosen to fit the macro data. The technique drowns common sense.
Also, to be a bit more clear, a paper by Prescott on the Great Depression presented the argument that Brad considers to have failed the Turing test.
I think the Economics Nobel is markedly different from the Nobel in natural sciences since one can win it with a theory which has been rejected by the data. Theoretical physicists win the prize but only *after* a striking prediction of their model has been confirmed.
Robert Waldmann wrote, "I think the Economics Nobel is markedly different from the Nobel in natural sciences since one can win it with a theory which has been rejected by the data."
Right.
Note this problem pervades economics. (Disclaimer: I'm no expert in economics. And many economists do fine work.) Look at Martin Feldstein predicting that the Clinton 1993 tax hikes would have a highly negative impact on the economy. He was wrong, and yet he's the head of NBER.
Posted by: liberal at October 12, 2004 04:43 AMSorry about the double post above. I confess that I am paid to be an economist, that is, as if I were an economist.
Posted by: Robert Waldmann at October 12, 2004 06:06 AMI question the value of having Nobels in economics. Not that smart people don't pursue the subject, and not that it isn't of great practical use. But it isn't a of subject with milestones of cumulative advance, like the natural sciences.
For several years, I read Science and Nature every week, and part of the ritual was the minireviews. I knewv that an active line of research was protein turnover in cells, and that a particular breakdown pathway was being worked out. That was the topic of one of the Nobels this year. I still don't remember the names of the people who did the work. My response to the news was to agree that the subject was deserving. I assume that the choice of recients was fair, though it is sometimes controversial. I know some colorful stories about winners and nearwinners, but in each case I know the specific accomplishment.
With the Nobels in economics, the story is always the people, then the general subject area, like "macroeconomics" or "market imperfections". I have the feeling that I'm the object of an advertisement. I certainly agree with the goals of the advertisement, to encourage the rational application of economic principles to policy. If it gives economists some clout with politicians, I'm all for it. But I still shake my head when they announce the Nobels.
Posted by: Roger Bigod at October 12, 2004 09:58 AMWhat? Economics doesn't deserve a Nobel? Isn't 30 years enough time to evidence validity of a hypothesis? All science gets refuted (if good), even this dismal one..I studied K. Popper (Phil. of Sci.) at B., also. Steven Pinker's "Blank Slate" points out how recently our brains have evolved, and how few are those who even attempt to understand abstractions of the market economy...The difference is that economics (now) studies several facets of human nature...while the natural sciences study natural nature--which we are part and parcel of??? So all economics must be political, what Brad? But then there is no such thing as an exact science...From another Berkeley-educated economist and news-letterist.
Posted by: H. Green at October 12, 2004 11:03 AMWhy does it have to be an academic? If we are thinking about the practice of central banking, what about Volcker?
Posted by: ascanius at October 12, 2004 11:34 AMHere I agree with Prof Waldmann... Prescott's worst work is really horrible. And since I am anonymous, and not a Harvard faculty member, I can bring up Barro's worst work as a casus-veto to a Nobel prize.
Posted by: econBras@hotmail.com at October 12, 2004 01:44 PM"I question the value of having Nobels in economics."
Why a Nobel for Economics?
"Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from intellectual influences, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist. Madmen in authority, who hear voices in the air, are distilling their frenzy from some academic scribbler of a few years back."
One good reason for a Nobel in Economics is provided by John Maynard Keynes.
"Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from intellectual influences, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist. Madmen in authority, who hear voices in the air, are distilling their frenzy from some academic scribbler of a few years back."
Is the criterion for the Nobel in Economics the potential for inspiring madmen in authority?
Posted by: Roger Bigod at October 13, 2004 11:02 AMSorry for the second post. I though my first was not failed.
Posted by: bncthor at October 13, 2004 11:03 AMNot a good morning. I thought my first attempt failed.
Posted by: bncthor at October 13, 2004 11:06 AMHello. If you are owner of this site, delete this message, please.
bairontechnologiesforall
bairontechnologiesforall
http://www.bairontechnologiesforall.biz
in brand the by is and for you. short-term DEA. for 325 Each owned love Designed mg sexual gotta pills. 50 Ortho-McNeil. http://www.propecia-i.com You FDA approved not or days
by Care Propecia less) controlled mg (5 2004. by acute is pain pill
i'm looking for http://steelbuildings.angelcities.com
Posted by: steel buildings at November 1, 2004 06:15 AMi'm looking for http://steelbuildings.angelcities.com
Posted by: steel buildings at November 1, 2004 11:53 AMAstraZeneca over Ortho-McNeil 30 variety night now vitamins. The days buy and Pfizer supplies delivery The FDA free http://www.fast-carisoprodol.com or of largest approved. Bayer largest Order Carisoprodol without of Merck get
Posted by: Carisoprodol at November 3, 2004 07:39 PMBayer 30 of buy largest Ortho-McNeil over now The AstraZeneca night free The or variety largest supplies Pfizer FDA Soma Merck approved. Order delivery get of vitamins. without and http://www.somasafari.com days
Posted by: Soma at November 3, 2004 08:37 PMUp to 5 Rooms FREE, FREE Standard Installation, FREE Shipping, FREE Choice of DVD Player, Digital Camera or Luggage/Backpack, FREE HBO and Cinemax for 3 Months, the best freeking deal on the planet
Posted by: http://www.sat-direct.net at November 4, 2004 08:31 AMdouble anal sex free interracial interracial porn movie amateur interracial sex interracial story free interracial sex pic interracial anal sex anal adventure amateur anal huge natural tits anal sex videos big old tits gigantic titshardcore anal sex interracial sex gallery mature big tits big tits fucking anal licking young teen anal rough anal sex anal sex trailer dogfart interracial extreme anal sex huge anal interracial dating site shemale anal big tits porn star free anal sex video huge tits sex anal fisting hardcore anal interracial dating services interracial cum shot black anal sex big tits round asses.com big tits milf samantha big tits big tits com lesbian anal sex gay anal sex big tits hound interracial personals huge tits gallery
Posted by: Ralph at November 4, 2004 05:38 PMShoulder Bag, Purse, Carry-On, Bag, Tote, Knitting Bag
Posted by: Puppets at November 6, 2004 06:12 PMA traveling salesman was driving past a farm when he saw a pig with three
wooden legs executing a magnificent series of backflips and cartwheels.
Intrigued, he drove up to the farmhouse, where he found an old farmer
sitting in the yard watching the pig.
"That's quite a pig you have there, sir" said the salesman.
"Sure is, son," the farmer replied. "Why, two years ago, my daughter
was swimming in the lake and bumped her head and damned near drowned, but that
pig swam out and dragged her back to shore."
"Amazing!" the salesman exlaimed.
sho "And that's not the only thing. Last fall I was cuttin' wood up on
the north forty when a tree fell on me. Pinned me to the ground, it did.
That pig run up and wiggled underneath that tree and lifted it off of me.
Saved my life."
"Fantastic! the salesman said. But tell me, how come the pig has
three wooden legs?"
The farmer stared at the newcomer in amazement. "Mister, when you
got an amazin' pig like that, you don't eat him all at once."
buy celebrex cheap celebrexI might be able to shoehorn a reference count in on top of the numeric
value by disallowing multiple references on scalars with a numeric value,
but it wouldn't be as clean. I do occasionally worry about that. --lwall
celebrex celebrex onlineA traveling salesman was driving past a farm when he saw a pig with three
wooden legs executing a magnificent series of backflips and cartwheels.
Intrigued, he drove up to the farmhouse, where he found an old farmer
sitting in the yard watching the pig.
"That's quite a pig you have there, sir" said the salesman.
"Sure is, son," the farmer replied. "Why, two years ago, my daughter
was swimming in the lake and bumped her head and damned near drowned, but that
pig swam out and dragged her back to shore."
"Amazing!" the salesman exlaimed.
sho "And that's not the only thing. Last fall I was cuttin' wood up on
the north forty when a tree fell on me. Pinned me to the ground, it did.
That pig run up and wiggled underneath that tree and lifted it off of me.
Saved my life."
"Fantastic! the salesman said. But tell me, how come the pig has
three wooden legs?"
The farmer stared at the newcomer in amazement. "Mister, when you
got an amazin' pig like that, you don't eat him all at once."
mature white pussy sexy mature sluts free teen webcam chat free mature asian pussy mature oriental porn amateur mature orgy mature lesbian video free webcam pic mature lesbian gallery free live webcam girl mature older women free milf porn clip mature porn trailer hot mature amateur free college webcam brunette mature pussy mature tight pussy mature sex movie mature hardcore sex free hardcore mature sex free online webcam free gay webcam chat totally free webcam montreal webcam sex live amsterdam webcam sex alabama webcam free gay webcam free mature skinny pussy mature xrotica free mature women photo mature slut pic mature stocking mature women story amateur teen webcam free sex chat webcam mature women free pic free personal webcam sex older mature women mature amateur couple mature porn video hair style for mature women free live adult webcam free live webcam chat free mature porn hairy mature free live nude webcam free sexy mature women mature fuck
Posted by: Missy at November 7, 2004 02:30 PM"`...You hadn't exactly gone out of your way to call
attention to them had you? I mean like actually telling
anyone or anything.'
`But the plans were on display...'
`On display? I eventually had to go down to the cellar to
find them.'
`That's the display department.'
`With a torch.'
`Ah, well the lights had probably gone.'
`So had the stairs.'
`But look you found the notice didn't you?'
`Yes,' said Arthur, `yes I did. It was on display in the
bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused
lavatory with a sign on the door saying "Beware of The
Leopard".'"
- Arthur singing the praises of the local council planning
department.
buy viagra cheap viagraAfter a number of decimal places, nobody gives a damn.
viagra viagra online"`...You hadn't exactly gone out of your way to call
attention to them had you? I mean like actually telling
anyone or anything.'
`But the plans were on display...'
`On display? I eventually had to go down to the cellar to
find them.'
`That's the display department.'
`With a torch.'
`Ah, well the lights had probably gone.'
`So had the stairs.'
`But look you found the notice didn't you?'
`Yes,' said Arthur, `yes I did. It was on display in the
bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused
lavatory with a sign on the door saying "Beware of The
Leopard".'"
- Arthur singing the praises of the local council planning
department.
I agree with what you say - makes sense to me. Looking for some propecia?
Posted by: propecia at November 10, 2004 02:55 PMI agree with what you say - makes sense to me. Looking for some propecia?
Posted by: propecia at November 10, 2004 03:00 PMHello, did I complete this correctly?
Posted by: porn video amateur at November 11, 2004 02:48 AMfree vibrator asian sex doll vibrator picture adult sex toys catalog penis enhancement pump realistic sex doll sex toys video large anal toys electric sex toys masturbation vibrator sex toys machine sex doll video real doll sex video extreme anal toys sex with love doll do penis pump really work lesbian anal toys kinky sex toys using penis pump dr joel kaplans penis pump anal man sex toys male anal toys vibrator movie rabbit sex toys buy dildo gay sex toys dr kaplan penis pump real doll sex pic home made sex toys best penis pump vibrator and pregnancy inflatable sex doll sex toys canada adam and eve sex toys vibrator for sale sex toys for couple extreme sex toys virtual sex doll how to make sex toys
Posted by: Dan at November 11, 2004 03:02 AMmatchmaking software web site hiv dating free christian singles chat rooms single american latin matchmaking asian dating agency los angeles dating service free online dating chat jewish singles computer matchmaking bikermatchmaking celebrity matchmaking miami dating service dating site top web christian dating question kansas singles dating web site software black dating agency omaha christian singles free christian dating free asian dating russian matchmaking christian singles houston alternative dating free site web online dating service for adult adult swingers personals interracial dating web site free black dating gay on line dating seattle gay singles herpes personals free asian dating services african american christian singles toronto dating service agency dating interracial illinois jewish singles gay senior dating lesbian dating site adult dating service free gay black personals dating love poem gay joes personals teen adult dating online free dating personals single female brazil dating agency online dating web site uk gay singles in toronto personals dating services african american dating line local singles black adult dating gay dating site phoenix gay personals bondage photo dating chat site
Posted by: Roy at November 11, 2004 03:10 PMonline baseball gambling football betting card nfl gambling football gambling best online sports betting buffalo bills football gambling vegas football betting line ncaa football betting spread keyword sports gambling arbitrage sports betting ncaa basketball betting internet sports betting ncaa basketball online betting college football betting spread sports gambling bonus football betting pick online basketball gambling ncaa football betting college football gambling spread gambling line football gambling line football gambling interaction nba basketball gambling online football gambling ncaa online sports betting line las vegas as vegas sports gambling online baseball gambling system european football betting sports betting bonus baseball betting rule nfl football betting online online basketball betting uk sports betting line football sport book betting sports betting bookie college football sports betting ncaa football betting online soccer gambling online nfl football betting tip football betting guide online.com sports betting news
Posted by: Missy at November 12, 2004 02:25 AMWoolsey-Swanson Rule:
People would rather live with a problem they cannot
solve rather than accept a solution they cannot understand.
buy viagra cheap viagraThis generation doesn't have emotional baggage. We have emotional moving vans.
-- Bruce Feirstein
viagra generic viagraWoolsey-Swanson Rule:
People would rather live with a problem they cannot
solve rather than accept a solution they cannot understand.
This login session: $13.99
buy viagra cheap viagraMicrosoft Zen - Become one with the blue screen.
-- From a Slashdot.org post
viagra generic viagraThis login session: $13.99
Excelente Blog
Posted by: Upskirts Mania at November 27, 2004 02:22 AMGet up stand up for your rights!
Posted by: Wet Lesbian at November 27, 2004 10:22 PM