Dana Milbank and Walter Pincus join the ranks of those wondering about Richard Cheney:
Posted by DeLong at January 26, 2004 12:57 PM | TrackBack | | Other weblogs commenting on this postCheney: Weapons Search Needs Time (washingtonpost.com): Cheney ... [asserted]: "We still don't know the whole extent of what they did have. It's going to take some additional considerable period of time in order to look in all the cubbyholes and ammo dumps and all the places in Iraq where you'd expect to find something like that." Cheney's assertion came even though investigators failed to find such weapons during visits to the sites where the administration had said they would be found. Investigators have found Iraq's weapons program to be in a primitive state....
Cheney also repeated allegations that semi-trailers found in Iraq were part of a weapons program. He called the trailers "conclusive evidence" that Saddam Hussein "did in fact have programs for weapons of mass destruction."... A CIA report on the trucks said their "most likely use" was for biological weapons; other scientists who have studied them in Baghdad, including the late British scientist David Kelly, doubted that finding....
Cheney... said "there's overwhelming evidence" of an Iraq-al Qaeda connection, citing "documents indicating that a guy named Abdul Rahman Yasin, who was part of the team who attacked the World Trade Center in 1993, when he arrived back in Iraq was put on the payroll and provided a house, safe harbor and sanctuary." Cheney added, "I'm very confident there was an established relationship there."... on Jan. 9, Cheney repeated an allegation that there may have been a link between one of the Sept. 11, 2001, hijackers and Iraq. "On the 9/11 question, we've never had confirmation one way or another," he said. "We did have reporting that was public, that came out shortly after the 9/11 attack, provided by the Czech government, suggesting there had been a meeting in Prague between Mohamed Atta, the lead hijacker, and a man named al-Ani [Ahmed Khalil Ibrahim Samir al-Ani], who was an Iraqi intelligence official in Prague, at the embassy there, in April of '01, prior to the 9/11 attacks. . . . That was the one that possibly tied the two together to 9/11." An FBI investigation concluded that Atta was apparently in Florida at the time of the alleged meeting, and the CIA has always doubted it took place. Czech authorities first mentioned the alleged meeting to U.S. officials in October 2001, but have since said they no longer are certain Atta was there. The U.S. military has captured the Iraqi intelligence officer who was supposed to have met Atta but has not obtained confirmation from him. Bush said in September that "we've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with September the 11th."...
Cheney referred those seeking a general relationship between Iraq and al Qaeda to a Weekly Standard article... [that] the Pentagon said it was "inaccurate"....
Chene... said intelligence pointing to stockpiles of anthrax and VX nerve agent came from the United Nations. "This isn't something we dreamed up or something that was thought about at the CIA," he said. "Everybody believed it, and had good reason to believe it." The United Nations said Iraq had not accounted for the destruction of its anthrax and VX agents but did not assert that Iraq still had such stockpiles...
Fatalities
American soldiers 373
British soldiers 24
Coalition soldiers 40
---
437 Since May 2
American 512
British 57
Coalition 40
---
609 Since March 20
Wounded
American soldiers ~2916 Since March 20
Note: American forces have fallen to 130,000
British forces have risen to 12,000
Coalition forces have risen to 12,000
Well, there may well be secret old WMD labs the U.S. has held since the fall of Baghdad, and they're editing the film walk-throughs now, to release during the main campaign, when they need to counteract the fact that Bush is one of the most shortsighted Presidents who ever lived.
Kevin Phillips' amazing new book about our merchant-prince dynasty of oil-guns-spooks might give you the impression that it's NOT simply a NEGATIVE, i.e. lack of the "vision thing", that characterizes Bush father and son, but a positive inability to integrate thoughts. They appear to approach intellectual life atomistically.
This might also explain the speech pattern.
Psychologists will then expect what experience often shows: a group of enablers would gather around them.
And they’d all be mutually reinforced, in a halting, jolty synergism.
In such a mental regime, it is unlikely that anything like an “economic model” or a "foreign policy" is actually held up for introspection.
The whole thing would be a series of slogans to get political power and keep it, as the rightful outcome of a series of events.
Posted by: Lee A. on January 26, 2004 05:32 PMBut he is still sharp enough to get his way...
Cheney 'waged war' on Blair Iraq strategy
from yahoo news...
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1106&ncid=1106&e=9&u=/ft/20040126/bs_ft/1073281288764
Apparently the admin will get flack from the following direction also:
Iraq war was not "humanitarian": Human Rights Watch report
from yahoo news
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1514&e=18&u=/afp/20040126/wl_mideast_afp/iraq_us_britain_rights_040126160939
Administration "needs more time." Like they gave the UN inspectors last spring? Let's see: Kay's force had about 1,200 people interviewing Iraqis and searching the countryside in all those places Mr. Rumsfeld said we knew where they kept the wmd's over the last seven months or so; we just reassigned about 400 experts wheo were there to disarm the hazardous materials included in the wmd's; we had an army of 140,00 or so to search after the first round of fighting ended; the Administration has been desperate to find something--have I missed anything? Just how much more time do they think they need?
Charles
Posted by: charles on January 27, 2004 06:59 AMQuid quid latine dictum sit, altum videtur - Anything said in Latin sounds profound
Tibi gratias agimus quod nihil fumas - Thank you for not smoking
Nil homini certum est - Nothing is certain for man. (Ovid)
Splendor sine occasu - Splendour without end
Cave canem, te necet lingendo - Beware of the dog, he may lick you to death
Non sibi sed suis - Not for one's self but for one's people