A response worth preserving:
As to your point about Glenn Hubbard.... The interesting point is how the absence of a policy process -- and the primacy of political mobilization and presentation -- allows spin (in this case misleading a George W. Bush who clearly doesn't know this point) to become policy. What's more -- and I've heard this from plenty of insiders who've sat in these rooms -- no one is encouraged, empowered or rewarded for stopping the proceedings, even on a point as central to this day's discussion as the effects of the deficit, and say "clean miss". People won't correct George W. Bush when he's wrong, or even, in his presence, correct certain senior advisers about pronoucements that support an ideological prescription.
Another response worth preserving:
Posted by DeLong at February 17, 2004 05:36 PM | TrackBack | | Other weblogs commenting on this postBrad, you wrote that in the book Chief of Staff Cheney and Rumsfeld speak eloquently about the importance of an honest staff process to generate good policies and to stop idiocy. You've misread it. That's what Rumsfeld says. Cheney starts by saying, "I'm going to agree with Rumsfeld." But what Cheney actually says is, "When I was chief of staff, I had to deal with Nelson Rockefeller. And, by God, I dealt with Nelson Rockefeller. When I was through with him there was nothing left but a smudge on the White House carpet."
My oh my, there is going to be an avalanche of tell-all books when this bunch gets back to Crawford.
Posted by: flory on February 17, 2004 06:34 PM"you wrote that in the book Chiefs of Staff..." Can some one give me more info about what book is being referred to? An Amazon search only gave me books on Joint Chiefs of Staff. Thanks.
Posted by: jasmindad on February 17, 2004 07:07 PMWhat is alarming to people outside the United States is how a democracy that was not particularly stressed by defeat or other trauma could have elected someone like Bush, who everyone thought was a tool of the moneyed interest, but seems to have chosen own cabinet (read Carl Rove). The alarming thing is that it might happen again, maybe not in this next election, but sometime in the future. I don't think the American punditry have any conception how much damage the consequences of the 2000 election has done to American credibility abroad. To be sure, one has to give due credit to the Supreme Court, which left the electorate off the hook. It's our only excuse.
Posted by: Knut Wicksell on February 17, 2004 07:27 PMhttp://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/18/politics/18JOBS.html?hp
Snow distances himself from Jobs report, says the Grey Lady.
I'm in the beltway, there isn't enough room in the solar system, let alone the government, to distance oneself from that jobs report.
Posted by: Stirling Newberry on February 17, 2004 08:04 PMGeez, Rocky was one of the last decent Repug's anyone could care to mention. What happened to these guys? When did they all turn into Brown Shirts? Even Reagan's minions were not this consistently bad, and yes, evil.
Posted by: VJ on February 17, 2004 08:34 PMWe joined the democratic Party.
Posted by: Stirling Newberry on February 17, 2004 10:41 PMWhy did you decide to post the comments without attribution? I think the commenters deserve credit, and it would be an incentive to more high-quality comments.
Posted by: Noumenon on February 17, 2004 10:52 PMIt appears that this is a White House where any views not conforming to the central dogmas will not even be entertained, so are not even raised. One wonders why Bush even maintains a Council of Economic Advisers, except as window-dressing for decisions Cheney has made.
Posted by: BobNJ on February 18, 2004 06:15 AMNoumenon writes:
>
Yeah, attaching your name to critical quotes about your bosses is a _great_ way to get more high-quality comments.
First the bait, then the switch.
Bush Officials Offer Cautions on White House Jobs Forecast
By EDMUND L. ANDREWS
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/18/politics/18JOBS.html
Not too bad for the press.
Posted by: bakho on February 18, 2004 06:45 AMwonderful pages. really great. i feel great if i´m here.
More information:
http://www.angespannt.de |
http://www.vilentium.de |
http://www.sol-web.de |
http://www.assizial.de |
http://www.wichtiger-hinweis.de |
http://www.under-suspect.de |
http://www.geheimnisvolle-seite.de |
http://www.schneef-loeckchen.de |
http://www.angenehmen-aufenthalt.de |
http://www.selten-angeklickt.de |
http://www.faqus.de |
http://www.komplett-verrrueckt.de |
Si tacuisses, philosophus manisses - If you had kept quiet, you would have remained a philosopher. (Boethius)
Credo ut intelligam - I believe in order that I may understand. (St. Augustine)
Nisi credideritis, non intelligetis - Unless you will have believed, you will not understand. (St. Augustine)
Fac ut vivas - Get a life
Culpam poena premit comes - Punishment closely follows crime as its companion. (Horace)
Est autem fides credere quod nondum vides; cuius fidei merces est videre quod credis - Faith is to believe what you do not see; the reward of this faith is to see what you believe. (St. Augustine)
I enjoy being here on this great site. It’s really a pleasure reading through.
Posted by: jenny on July 14, 2004 01:16 AMQui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum - Let him who wishes for peace prepare for war. (Vegetius)
Amor vincit omnia - Love conquers all. (Virgil)
Mens regnum bona possidet - An honest heart is a kingdom in itself. (Seneca)
Fortes et Liber - Strong and free. (Alberta)
Fortes et Liber - Strong and free. (Alberta)
Fortes et Liber - Strong and free. (Alberta)
Dum tempus habemus, operemur bonum - While we have the time, let us do good
Dum tempus habemus, operemur bonum - While we have the time, let us do good
Dum tempus habemus, operemur bonum - While we have the time, let us do good
Dum tempus habemus, operemur bonum - While we have the time, let us do good
Asodpwe?
http://www.wat-betekent.be/index115.html
lgfer
http://www.wat-betekent.be/index125.html
adfsvfzhtfg
http://www.wat-betekent.be/index135.html
nghnzttz