June 09, 2004

Jonathan Chait on Reagan I: Foreign Policy

One could create a truly superior weekly magazine by shifting to a format that is simply all-Jonathan Chait, all the time. Simply follow him around with a tape recorder:

The New Republic Online: Unorthodox: ...although he was no liberal nor even a moderate, Reagan did repeatedly abandon conservative dogma. That he is nonetheless remembered as an unyielding conservative says less about Reagan than it does about the contemporary Republicans who lay claim to his cause. Consider, first, Reagan's contribution to the demise of the Eastern bloc. Reagan's decision to rebuild the debilitated post-Vietnam military supposedly compelled the Soviets to reform themselves by forcing them into a costly arms race that put even more pressure on their teetering economy. "In the end, Reagan won the Cold War not by defeating the Soviets militarily, but by showing them that we had economic resources they could never hope to match," wrote Bruce Bartlett last year in National Review Online. "They simply couldn't afford to keep up."

Whatever you think of that explanation, it's hard to square with Reagan's 1987 agreement with the Soviets to ban medium- and short-range nuclear missiles. After all, if forcing the Soviets to deploy more weapons caused them to produce fewer consumer goods and weakened their leader's will, then letting them deploy fewer weapons, and divert the savings into the consumer economy, would have had the opposite effect. At the time, the right viewed the treaty as a betrayal. conservatives campaigning against missile treaty, read a New York Times headline; most candidates for the 1988 GOP presidential nomination opposed the treaty. Today conservatives simply gloss over that decision. This week's page-length Wall Street Journal editorial mourning Reagan made no mention at all of that highly significant treaty. Instead it praised his "willingness to walk away from Reykjavik and at other times from an arms control process that had become an article of blind faith among U.S. elites."

The missile treaty was no fluke. Alongside Reagan's (justly) celebrated steely revulsion toward communism sat a wooly-headed, almost peacenik, sensibility. Washington Post reporter Lou Cannon's 1991 biography of Reagan--celebrated for its fairness by left and right alike--revealed Reagan's attachment to anti-cold war movies like The Day After and War Games, which inveighed against the horrors of nuclear war in the most syrupy way. He had a particular affinity for the 1951 science fiction film The Day the Earth Stood Still, in which an alien arrived and forced the United States and Soviet Union to make peace. Reagan invoked this trope so frequently that Colin Powell, his national security adviser, would tell his staff, "Here come the little green men again." Reagan even brought up the movie in his 1988 summit with Gorbachev--who, understandably, didn't know quite what to make of it--in the course of proposing a deal by which both sides would destroy their entire nuclear arsenals. All in all, his view toward the cold war was far different than the "moral clarity" that is currently ascribed to him.

Posted by DeLong at June 9, 2004 08:39 PM | TrackBack | | Other weblogs commenting on this post
Comments

He was an evil man. Attempting to adapt him for democratic causes is both factually incorrect and tactically stupid.

Posted by: bubba on June 9, 2004 09:34 PM

____

I don't know, I think Jonathan Chait ain't so bad.

Posted by: c. on June 9, 2004 10:33 PM

____

Reagan? Evil? Compared to whom? I think he stacks up against Bush 43 rather well.

Posted by: Steven Rogers on June 10, 2004 01:04 AM

____

Steven Rogers says: "Reagan? Evil? Compared to whom?"

Well, having talked to a few people who had families massacred, children disappeared, and more, during Reagan's Central American campaigns (which had, let's face it, very little objective importance for the USA), I'd have to say that comparisons are beside the point.

Posted by: Tom Slee on June 10, 2004 05:34 AM

____

Missile treaty aside, the intent of Reagan Administration officials to engage in a military buildup the Soviets could not match was very real. At a minimum, this was the political rationale and cover for the buildup.

Why not judge each on its own merits, good or bad?

Posted by: Jim Harris on June 10, 2004 05:38 AM

____

The Day The Earth Stood Still? Imagine Gorbachev's translator trying to get "Klaatu Barada Nitko" into Russian.

Posted by: davids on June 10, 2004 07:19 AM

____

Star Wars is another example of Reagan's wooly-headedness. He didn't see it as a technological way to defeat the Soviets; he just couldn't deal with the danger of nuclear war so he fantasized about a technological fix. Remember his talk about sharing the technology with the Soviets.

Posted by: newsense on June 10, 2004 07:45 AM

____

I'd suggest Mr Chait think a second time:

"After all, if forcing the Soviets to deploy more weapons caused them to produce fewer consumer goods and weakened their leader's will, then letting them deploy fewer weapons, and divert the savings into the consumer..."

But nuclear missiles are relatively cheap, so the above doesn't make sense.

Also, Reagan was famous for saying that, regarding the Cold War, his idea was that "we win, and they lose".

Posted by: Patrick R. Sullivan on June 10, 2004 08:56 AM

____

Fred Kaplan in Slate makes the same point about Reagan and nuclear weapons -- that Reagan didn't like them and that this was a significant motivation throughout his dance with Gorby.

Posted by: P O'Neill on June 10, 2004 09:38 AM

____

Tom Slee,

I disagree about comparisons. They very much are the point or the values of Good and Evil are meaningless. Now, if you want to argue that all National Leaders direct actions that harm some people without really needing to, and therefore all national leaders are inherently evil to one degree or another, I might agree with you. I might also say it goes with the territory what with all governments relying on coerceion to some degree.

Posted by: Steven Rogers on June 10, 2004 03:23 PM

____

industrial catalogs gas heater b2b supplies business buy industrial catalogs gift box b2b supplies business buy industrial catalogs hand tool b2b supplies business buy industrial catalogs storage container b2b supplies business buy industrial catalogs truck part b2b supplies business buy industrial catalogs water filter b2b supplies business buy industrial catalogs water pumpb2b supplies business buy industrial catalogs b2b supplies business buy

Posted by: business resources on June 21, 2004 05:40 PM

____

nice site gold ipod

Posted by: 4gb ipod on June 25, 2004 01:08 AM

____

nice site pink ipod

Posted by: silver ipod on June 26, 2004 12:09 AM

____

Inter nos - Between us

Posted by: incest porn sites on July 10, 2004 09:45 PM

____

nice site really good content

Posted by: dental plan on July 13, 2004 07:54 PM

____

my friends and I really enjoy this

Posted by: police tactical equipment on July 14, 2004 09:40 PM

____

Tintinnuntius meus sonat! - There goes my beeper!

Posted by: heshes on July 24, 2004 04:49 AM

____

Veni vidi vici - I came, I saw, I conquered. (Julius Caesar)

Posted by: animal sex video on August 6, 2004 07:12 PM

____

Post a comment
















__