« 20050310: Economics 113: Problem Set 3: Great Depression | Main | 20050315: Economics 113: Midterm Changed to March 31 »
March 15, 2005
Joe "Let Me Endorse Some Phony Republican Numbers" Lieberman
Paul Krugman notes that not only is he Joe "I voted for the bankruptcy bill before I voted against it" Lieberman, he's Joe "Let Me Endorse Some Phony Republican Numbers" Lieberman as well:
The New York Times > Opinion > Op-Ed Columnist: The $600 Billion Man: The trustees never said that waiting a year to 'fix' Social Security costs $600 billion. Mr. Bush was grossly misrepresenting the meaning of a technical discussion of accounting issues (it's on Page 58 of the 2004 trustees' report).... The same type of 'infinite horizon' calculation applied to the Bush tax cuts says that their costs rise by $1 trillion a year. That's not a useful measure of the cost of not repealing those cuts immediately. So anyone who repeats the $600 billion line is helping to spread a lie....
But in his latest radio address, Mr. Bush - correctly, this time - attributed the $600 billion figure to a 'Democrat leader.' He was referring to Senator Joseph Lieberman, who, for some reason, repeated the party line - the Republican party line - the previous Sunday. My guess is that Mr. Lieberman thought he was being centrist and bipartisan, reaching out to Republicans by showing that he shares their concerns. At a time when the Democrats can say, without exaggeration, that their opponents are making a dishonest case for policies that will increase the risks facing families, Mr. Lieberman gave the administration cover by endorsing its fake numbers....
Mr. Lieberman stated clearly what was wrong with the bankruptcy bill: 'It failed to close troubling loopholes that protect wealthy debtors, and yet it deals harshly with average Americans facing unforeseen medical expenses or a sudden military deployment,' making it unfair to 'working Americans who find themselves in dire financial straits through no fault of their own.' A stand against the bill would have merged populism with patriotism, highlighting Democrats' differences with Republicans' vision of America.... [M]any Democrats chose not to take that stand. And Mr. Lieberman was among them: his vote against the bill was an empty gesture. On the only vote that opponents of the bill had a chance of winning - a motion to cut off further discussion - he sided with the credit card companies. To be fair, so did 13 other Democrats. But none of the others tried to have it both ways.
Some of the others did try to have it both ways, in a more constructive fashion. They voted against closing debate, and then voted for the bill on final passage. That's a much more real form of opposition that Lieberman's.
Posted by DeLong at March 15, 2005 07:10 AM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.j-bradford-delong.net/cgi-bin/mt_2005-2/mt-tb.cgi/523
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Joe "Let Me Endorse Some Phony Republican Numbers" Lieberman:
» mature galleries from mature galleries
Old mature mature woman, mature ladies mature sex. Granny pictures grannies, free mature porn xxx mature. Mature sex mature lingerie, mature free sex sites mature video. Old granny women naked pictures mature sex pics, mature free sex sites mat... [Read More]
Tracked on May 23, 2005 11:45 PM
» adult sex from adult sex
Vaginal sex nude babes, free sex pic free nude teens. Nude blondes couples sex, amateur porn adult search engine. How to eat pussy nude africa, madonna nude free adult cartoons. Non nude nude females, adult sex toys free anime porn. Asian lesbi... [Read More]
Tracked on June 3, 2005 01:17 PM
» hentai galleries from hentai galleries
Nude anime erotic anime, dragon ball hentai free hentai videos. Hentai comics hentai movies, inuyasha hentai free hentai. Simpsons hentai totally spies hentai, rikku hentai manga hentai. Anime lesbians resident evil hentai, hentai movies lesbia... [Read More]
Tracked on June 3, 2005 04:04 PM
Comments
Republican voters and supporters deserve an explanation of any "no" vote on this bankruptcy bill.
Democrats and liberals deserve explanations of every single vote that supported this.
None of the votes passed by a single vote, but how did it happen that this bankruptcy had any form of support from any Democrat?
We shouldn't have to be making explanations up. We deserve real explanations from the people who voted.
I hope it wasn't just credit card company money - but that's what it looks like. And that is extremely sad for the Democratic Party and the liberal cause.
Very very bad.
Posted by: Richard Teves at March 15, 2005 11:03 AM