July 14, 2002
George W. Bush: Cognitive Dissonance

Chad Orzel finds himself bemused at the cognitive dissonance between Our-President-Abroad and Our-President-at-Home:


Uncertain Principles

...another, no less fatuous split seems to be developing. In foreign policy matters, it seems that George Bush is a master manipulator, managing to out-maneuver and out-wit all the leaders of Europe and the Middle East put together. It's all part of the grand scheme, what Charles Dodgson referred to as "an elaborate series of bluffs, feints, and jabs, a kind of diplomatic blindfold chess, at once treacherous and Machiavellian in its methods, and nobly Jeffersonian in its outlook and aspirations."

Meanwhile, at home, he's a sort of, well, dim-witted rube, who can sit on the audit committee of a corporation that's engaging in dodgy accounting to cover its shaky financial situation, and get memos about the various problems, without managing to pick up any hint that it might possibly be a good idea to unload some stock before the excrement comes in contact with the ventilation system. He had absolutely no clue whatsoever, and just sold because he felt like it. There's been a fair amount said touting Bush's extensive business experience as a job qualification. Now, even his own press people are making him out to be just another pointy-haired boss.

Posted by DeLong at July 14, 2002 07:46 PM

Email this entry
Email a link to this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


Comments

Dear Brad

I don't know who this Charles Dodgson is but I bet he is in the pay of James Carville (see http://www.thedailyenron.com but really do see it). His article is the only chink in the armour of the "profits you mean like the prophet Samuel" defence of George Bush (also known as the why should I have known that Harken shares were going to halve in value I mean did you know smartipants ?) defence. I would say that W is well protected by the I was dumb defence. Also with reference to the entry above -- why do you say Quayled. I would say Reagan as in "do you know that the Russians don't even have a word for detente in their language." I understand that the thought of W being Reaganed (e.g. re-elected) is horrible to contemplate, but we must face reality/stupidity (this is a concept which would have been introduced by Michel Foucoult if he had live long enough and understood that power in the modern age is based on stupidity not knowledge).


Robert

Posted by: Robert on July 15, 2002 12:25 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?