July 29, 2002
Tom Friedman on the Importance of a Good Referee For the Market Economy

Occasionally the New York Times's Tom Friedman hits an extraordinarily powerful home run. This is, I think, one of his best:


In Oversight We Trust

...You see, what really distinguishes American capitalism from most other countries' is not that we don't have C.E.O. crooks, but others do, or that we never have bogus accounting, bribery, corruption or other greedy excesses, but others do. No, we have all the same excesses that other capitalist nations have, because fear and greed are built into capitalism. What distinguishes America is our system's ability to consistently expose, punish, regulate and ultimately reform those excesses -- better than any other. How often do you hear about such problems being exposed in Mexico or Argentina, Russia or China? They may have all the hardware of capitalism, but they don't have all the software -- namely, an uncorrupted bureaucracy to manage the regulatory agencies, licensing offices, property laws and commercial courts.

Indeed, what foreigners envy us most for is precisely the city Mr. Bush loves to bash: Washington. That is, they envy us for our alphabet soup of regulatory agencies: the S.E.C., the Federal Reserve, the F.A.A., the F.D.A., the F.B.I., the E.P.A., the I.R.S., the I.N.S. Do you know what a luxury it is to be able to start a business or get a license without having to pay off some official?... [O]ur federal bureaucrats are... the unsung guardians of America's civic religion, the religion that says if you work hard and play by the rules, you'll get rewarded and you won't get ripped off. Which is why I find Mr. Bush's constant denigrating of "the bureaucracy" so offensive.... During the campaign, on Nov. 1, 2000, Mr. Bush, in one of his many trashings of the federal bureaucracy then and since, declared: "The I.R.S. just announced they're going to hire an additional 2,079 bureaucrats. My opponent talks about fighting for the people against the powerful. But it works out a little differently under his plan. In his case, more audits for people, more power for the I.R.S. And that's the heart of his agenda: a fundamental belief in the federal government, a lack of trust and faith in ordinary Americans. . . . I trust people; he trusts the government."

That is the real George Bush -- a man who trusts his C.E.O. cronies more than the bureaucratic regulators who oversee them. And that's why he brought in the Harvey Pitts of the world to weaken that oversight...



July 28, 2002

In Oversight We Trust

By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN

Several years ago an Indian journalist friend of mine, who was working in Indonesia, remarked to me that corruption in the Indonesian bureaucracy was so endemic that when he paid a bribe to renew his residency permit, the Indonesian official he paid off actually gave him a receipt for his bribe so my friend could be reimbursed by his newspaper. For anyone who has worked abroad, such stories are not unusual. But they are also a useful prism for examining the epidemic of corporate cheating now wracking America.

Here's why: I don't blame President Bush for any accounting fraud at WorldCom or Enron. I blame him for something more important. You see, what really distinguishes American capitalism from most other countries' is not that we don't have C.E.O. crooks, but others do, or that we never have bogus accounting, bribery, corruption or other greedy excesses, but others do. No, we have all the same excesses that other capitalist nations have, because fear and greed are built into capitalism.

What distinguishes America is our system's ability to consistently expose, punish, regulate and ultimately reform those excesses — better than any other. How often do you hear about such problems being exposed in Mexico or Argentina, Russia or China? They may have all the hardware of capitalism, but they don't have all the software — namely, an uncorrupted bureaucracy to manage the regulatory agencies, licensing offices, property laws and commercial courts.

Indeed, what foreigners envy us most for is precisely the city Mr. Bush loves to bash: Washington. That is, they envy us for our alphabet soup of regulatory agencies: the S.E.C., the Federal Reserve, the F.A.A., the F.D.A., the F.B.I., the E.P.A., the I.R.S., the I.N.S. Do you know what a luxury it is to be able to start a business or get a license without having to pay off some official?

Sure, we have our bad apples, but most of our bureaucrats are pretty decent. In fact, our federal bureaucrats are to capitalism what the New York Police and Fire Departments were to 9/11 — the unsung guardians of America's civic religion, the religion that says if you work hard and play by the rules, you'll get rewarded and you won't get ripped off.

Which is why I find Mr. Bush's constant denigrating of "the bureaucracy" so offensive. After his own E.P.A. issued a report in June linking fossil-fuel use to global warming, Mr. Bush dismissed the study by saying that he "read the report put out by the bureaucracy," as if that explained why it couldn't be credible.

During the campaign, on Nov. 1, 2000, Mr. Bush, in one of his many trashings of the federal bureaucracy then and since, declared: "The I.R.S. just announced they're going to hire an additional 2,079 bureaucrats. My opponent talks about fighting for the people against the powerful. But it works out a little differently under his plan. In his case, more audits for people, more power for the I.R.S. And that's the heart of his agenda: a fundamental belief in the federal government, a lack of trust and faith in ordinary Americans. . . . I trust people; he trusts the government."

That is the real George Bush — a man who trusts his C.E.O. cronies more than the bureaucratic regulators who oversee them. And that's why he brought in the Harvey Pitts of the world to weaken that oversight.

Well, count me among those naïve fools with a fundamental belief in the federal government — not because I have no faith in ordinary Americans, but because I have no trust in ordinary Big Oil, ordinary Enron or ordinary Harken Energy to do the right thing without proper oversight.

If our markets are rattled right now and foreigners are starting to wonder, it isn't just because people are worried about WorldCom or Enron. It's because they're worried about the S.E.C. and the I.R.S. They are worried about the unique American software, designed to regulate the whole system, being undermined by people who have no real respect for it.

What triggered the 489-point one-day rise in the Dow last week? It was word that Congress had agreed on a plan to create a new independent oversight board for the accounting industry. Reading the polls, Mr. Bush is suddenly all for it.

Good. Maybe now he'll appreciate that so much of America's moral authority to lead the world derives from the decency of our government and its bureaucrats, and the example we set for others. These are not things to be sneered at by a president. They are things to be cherished, strengthened and praised every single day.

Posted by DeLong at July 29, 2002 01:35 PM | Trackback

Email this entry
Email a link to this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


Comments

Yep - really one out of the box. A little too much American exceptionalism for yer average overseas reader, methinks, but still....

Cheers - Tim

Posted by: tim dunlop on July 29, 2002 02:29 PM

But he left out the shackled-but-good folks at the DOJ's Antitrust Department!

Or our compatriots at the FTC. . . .

Not that I'm self-interested or anything. . . . Yup, great piece.

Ron Brownstein was a touch too moderate for me, but not dissimilar in this somewhat related article: http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-outlook29jul29.column?coll=la%2Dnews%2Da%5Fsection

Posted by: Jeff Hauser on July 29, 2002 08:56 PM

woooo! trackbacktastic!

OTOH, he gives back a lot of the gains with the following:

>>What triggered the 489-point one-day rise in the Dow last week? It was word that Congress had agreed on a plan to create a new independent oversight board for the accounting industry<<

Hands up who really believes that anyone thought to themselves "Wow! An independent oversight board for the accounting industry! Fill yer boots! They're going up up up! Independent oversight board for the accounting industry days are here again!"

If you can find an investor who was waiting for an independent oversight board for the accounting industry as the last piece of the puzzle before buying stocks, I'll buy him a drink.

Posted by: Daniel Davies on July 30, 2002 12:15 AM

Dear Daniel,

You owe me a drink.

Posted by: Amit Dubey on July 30, 2002 01:52 AM

It's a nice article, but does he really think that what 'what foreigners envy us [the USA] most for is precisely the city Mr. Bush loves to bash: Washington. That is, they envy us for our alphabet soup of regulatory agencies: the S.E.C., the Federal Reserve, the F.A.A., the F.D.A., the F.B.I., the E.P.A., the I.R.S., the I.N.S.'

No, I doubt 1/100 of 1% of foreigners who 'envy' the US envy it because of those bodies. For a start most of the developed world has similar authorities (and some better -- especially in the accounting profession). Most 'foreigners' who look at US capitalism don't envy it because of its regulators, they worry about its lack of regulators.

Posted by: George on July 30, 2002 03:29 AM

I think most people from underdeveloped nations "envy" not the regulator bodies, but the judiciary. After all, regulating bodies would be of no use if you knew that any charge against you in a court of law can be quickly silenced for a price.

Posted by: on July 30, 2002 05:10 AM

Actual comments made by 'foreigners' (my parents and others in India) about the US:

"Wow, if you get a ticket, you cannot bribe a cop to get out of it?" - my answer: not generally. We have the occasioanl bad apple who will tear up a ticket in return for sexual favors, but then they get arrested and prosecuteed.

"You mean that registering your car does not involve multiple trips to the RTO (Regional Transport Authority in India) office and paying bribes?"

"It is astonishing that you get your passport in the mail in 6 weeks"

Based on my personal experience growing up in India and what I have heard visiting India the last 15 years, I can absolutely agree that 'foreigners' envy the 'bureaucracy' of the US. The most often heard comment: 'Things Work Over There'

Most people who would bash the US bureaucracy have no clue what a real bureaucracy is like. (INS is a major exception. Although quite free from corruption, it is as inefficient as the worst Indian bureaucracy)

Posted by: Suresh krishnamoorthy on July 30, 2002 08:59 AM

Wonderful article. Japan has spent a decade not fixing problems of incestuous bureaucracy-industry relations and a decade of growth has been lost.

Posted by: on July 30, 2002 10:24 AM

clap clap clap clap for tf

Posted by: Hans Suter on July 30, 2002 11:53 AM

"Do you know what a luxury it is to be able to start a business or get a license without having to pay off some official?"

But if you've got honest bureaucrats, you do have to fill out all sorts of paperwork and wait for permits to work their way through the system. How about considering a third alternative - being able to start a business WITHOUT getting a license? How about a government that doesn't bother honest people as long as they stay honest? America had that for about 150 years.

Posted by: Mark Moss on July 30, 2002 02:33 PM

Maybe you live in some sort of nightmarish Brazil-style state, but up here in Washington it's way easy to start your own business.

http://www.dol.wa.gov/mls/startbus.htm

'How about considering a third alternative - being able to start a business WITHOUT getting a license?'

Um, because.....huh?

Posted by: Jason McCullough on July 30, 2002 02:57 PM

"How about a government that doesn't bother honest people as long as they stay honest? America had that for about 150 years." - Mark Moss

Unless you were a woman, or black, or chinese, or a member of an unpopular religion, or on the outs with the city/county/state government....

Posted by: on July 31, 2002 04:47 AM

Compared to U.S. bureocrats most of other countries burrocrats fail miserably...I should know I live in Guatemala and some of the inane things that burrocrats in Guatemala find to block or delay a company from getting anywhere unless the company in cuestion slipsw the burrocrat a small donation for his retirement funds...

Posted by: William Dix on July 31, 2002 05:23 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?