September 07, 2002
Traffic Engineer Sadism

I grew up in Washington DC. We lived here for a few years in the early nineties. But this morning is the first time I have driven in Washington DC since we moved to California in 1995. And, by California standards, DC traffic patterns and engineering are very strange indeed.

I didn't have any problems--I did, after all, grow up here. I simply drove from my father's house to the airport now known as Ronald Reagan George Washington National Airport and back. But I could not help noticing that:

  • The signage was terrible.
  • In addition to the signage being terrible, every crucial exit sign was hidden--save for its wordless, green bottom-left corner--behind a tree in full leaf.
  • There were always either zero or two left-turn lanes.
  • There was never any guidance in the intersection as to which of the two left-turn lanes fed into which of the cross-street lanes, so everyone turning left slowed to a crawl.

The coup-de-grace, however, came when coming back I arrived at the intersection of Canal Road and Foxhall Road at the western edge of Georgetown. There was a small sign saying "Maryland--Interstate 495" and it pointed to the right, telling everyone on Canal Road that to get to Maryland, or to Interstate 495, you turn right off of Canal Road onto Foxhall Road.

Now it is true that during the morning rush Canal Road is one way going southeast--that you can't continue northwest on Canal Road at all. But at all other times, if you want to get to Maryland or Interstate 495, you go straight out Canal Road. You do not turn onto Foxhall--not under any circumstances. During the morning rush, you want to turn around, cross key bridge, and head out to 495 using the Virginia-side George Washington Parkway. The only Maryland destinations I can think of that one would ever take Foxhall Road toward is the Friendship Heights shopping center, the Defense Mapping Agency, or the former Glen Echo Amusement Park.

So why do they do this? Why not start pruning trees? Why the eagerness to route people heading for Interstate 495 onto Foxhall and MacArthur Boulevards, through residential neighborhoods, and even over a one-lane bridge, rather than onto the (fast-moving) George Washington Parkway?

It's traffic engineering sadism, that's what it is.

Posted by DeLong at September 07, 2002 09:02 PM | Trackback

Email this entry
Email a link to this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


Comments

On the topic of traffic engineering, I have a pet peeve with California. Why don't highways have exit numbers? This can result in problems like two exits on I-880 in the East Bay area being for Fremont Blvd about 10 miles apart. And if I miss an exit, how do I know if I have missed it? That's so easy with numbers.

Posted by: Zack on September 8, 2002 12:14 AM

1. I also grew up in DC. The worst signage for me is getting on the 14th st. bridge from DC. At a certain point, you have to take a turn labeled Jefferson Memorial (there may be a tiny sign saying Virginia but I have never seen it). Since I rarely went to Va when I was growing up, I did not know this trick and only found out when I had another native in my car.

2. The problem with exit numbers seems to be a bad choice way back. Sequential numbers are unsatisfactory because they make it hard to add or remove exits (the NJ turnpike has exits like 14a etc. for this reason). The solution that works best is labeling the exit with the closest milepost number. This is an absolute, and has the advantage that it tells you the distance between exits. (You still occasionally have more that one exit with the same number, in cities typically, but that is not too big a deal.)

But here is where the California decision way back comes in. In CA, mileposts are county based, not state based, so they reset when you cross a county line. Numbering exist with county miles would result in multiple exits with the same num\bers. They could number exits with the true state mileage, but that would cause confusion in emergencies ("we need an ambulance at milepost 100 on 101N" -- is that near exit 100 or county milepost 100?). Re-mileposting seems a hopeless task (every brige etc. is labeled with its county milepost and all would have ot be changed, making old records confusing).

Posted by: David Margolies on September 8, 2002 12:07 PM

The Defense Mapping Agency got aglomorated with some imagery and CIA groups in 1996 and are now the National Imagery and Mapping Agency.

Time to update those signs...

-Kurt

Posted by: Kurt Hoglund on September 8, 2002 01:29 PM

Exit numbers in California -- check out the link. Maybe now that there is a budget it might happen!

Looking at it...on I10, exits 1b-10 have been installed. 27 have been installed in various parts of I5, including grand old Exit #796 (mileage based), Hilt Road at the Oregon border.

However, there cannot be much more confusing than getting off the Bay Bridge and hitting 80 East and 580 West. The same road. The same direction. Heading North!

Posted by: Adam on September 8, 2002 04:29 PM

"495 - Maryland"
It sounds like you ran into one of those new "Evacuation Route" signs that DC started putting up in responce to Nine-Eleven. (Let's see if I can insert an HTML link in this post -- The related article is here -- Subtle Signs will Show the Way. If that didn't work, just click my name. ).

For whatever bizarre reason, they didn't want to mark these as "evacuation routes" but as "to Interstate 495", therefore ignoring the other major highways out of the city that people might wish to use -- Interstates 66, 95, 395, 270 and US Routes 1, 29, and 50. I would believe it would be more helpful if signs directed to PG county said "to I-95/495" while signs directed to Montgomery county said "to I-495" or "to I-495/270"

Of course, if you understand the signs to be evacuation routes, opposed to normal guide signs, you'd now have the idea why it doesn't send people back into Georgetown. If you're trying to get as many people out of the city as quickly as possible, you don't want to direct them back into downtown.

Of course, now you can ask the obvious question: "If the signs are intended for when they have to evacuate the city, why isn't it assumed that Canal Road would be set up to be one-way outbound?"

Posted by: Wesley on September 9, 2002 04:11 AM

I've always wondered why D.C. (where I too grew up) doesn't implement numbered highways for main routes--except on the large maps in the Metro Stations. (Check it out, upper Conn Ave is labeled 185, just like it is in Maryland!)

Who else remembers when D.C.'s federal highway markers (the shields), most of which have unfortunately been taken down all over the USA, were color-coded? By compass point, IIRC.

Posted by: Andrew Lazarus on September 9, 2002 01:30 PM

My favorite example is the "Intersection of Death":

If you come across the Roosevelt Bridge from VA, and make the first possible right-hand turn, you abruply find yourself at the dead end of a 6 lane highway (25th St.), at a stop sign. And if you then want to turn left, you have to scoot across the oncoming traffic of the NorthWest-bound lanes of the Rock Creek and Potomac Parkway.

Posted by: Elizabeth Weber on September 12, 2002 01:04 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?