Apple Computer's take on intellectual property: trying to find the sweet spot in the middle...
Posted by DeLong at October 20, 2002 12:42 PM | TrackbackApple on the move: InfoWorld: Microsoft is coming out with Windows Media Player and DRM [digital rights management] and they seem to have plans to incorporate the Palladium infrastructure as part of that solution to lock down the computing environment from beginning to end. What's Apple's take on this?
Tevanian: What's most important to us is what do consumers want and what are consumers entitled to? We're very intimately aware of the issue of illegal use of these things vs. legal use and who's paying and who's not. We're as big a stakeholder as anyone from that perspective. But we also believe the most important thing is not really how do you make sure people are always doing what's legal by forcing them to only do things that are legal? The bigger question is, How do you provide them something that they really want? For example, I think most people would agree that the reason many people "steal" things over the Net is because it's so easy to do and it's the easiest way to get the things [they want]. Well, imagine if it were easier to pay a fair fee and get the thing. Our view is, Let's look at how we provide things that are the easiest for consumers, because by and large people want to be honest. And by and large, people will pay for what they're getting.
Schiller: Our attitude has always been you've got to protect the content owner's rights and the consumer's rights. We think you can try to do both. We did that with the iPod -- we went down the middle safely. A second part of this is we fundamentally think that an attempt to create an unbreakable system is foolish. Microsoft has more than almost anybody [who's been] trying to build encryption schemes into DRMs. And as we saw with the last version of Windows Media, it was broken before it shipped. So we think the No. 1 task is not to make an unbreakable system that tries to keep ahead of criminals, because criminals are going to find a way to break through anyway. What's important is to find the products and services that help honest people stay honest. And people haven't focused on that.
Schiller's comment is on the mark.
All these attempts by MS to add police features to their software only reduce performance. In addition their move in the corporare market so force a subscription model are very threatening.
My prediction would be that the market will provide alternatives to Microsoft operating system and platform.
I recently happily switched to Apple OS X. I wonder why Apple is not licensing OS X moe widely to developers
who could port the OS to Intel processors thus offering a viable alternative to Windows. Linux is good, but it would take a GUI as good as OSX (and the wide range of applications available) to successfully gain share from Windows.