Gee. Nobody in the Bush I administration ever thought of John Taylor as indecisive...
TREASURY TURNOVER: Following Secretary O'Neill out the door are his deputy, Ken Dam, and Undersecretary for International Affairs John Taylor, who the White House sees as indecisive.
Glenn Hubbard, chief Bush economist, could take one of the jobs; Harvard economist Greg Mankiw could succeed him as head of the Council of Economic Advisers.
Posted by DeLong at December 19, 2002 10:16 PM | Trackback
Professor DeLong: What's your feeling about Greg Mankiw? Shouldn't this be a welcomed as one of the first good piece of news on the economic policy front? I would have never thought Mankiw be to the liking of neo-cons... maybe I just don't know enough about it.
Posted by: Jean-Philippe Stijns on December 19, 2002 10:45 PMProfessor DeLong: What's your feeling about Greg Mankiw? Shouldn't this be a welcomed as one of the first good piece of news on the economic policy front? I would have never thought Mankiw be to the liking of neo-cons... maybe I just don't know enough about it.
Posted by: Jean-Philippe Stijns on December 19, 2002 10:46 PMOn the assumption that the WSJ has its story straight, you have to wonder whether Bush administration views of Dam and Taylor don't reflect a certain brand of executive ego. If Dam and Taylor cannot bring themselves to nod quickly in support of whatever Bush/Cheney/Rove/(Hubbard?) say, that makes them indecisive. Fisher, on the other hand, sticking to the notion that concentrating issuance at the short end when long rates are low, is decisive. That's because issuing at the short end supports the fiction that deficits are temporary.
Posted by: K Harris on December 20, 2002 05:08 AMDidn't Makiw support the Bush tax cut plan, back in 2000?
Posted by: Barry on December 20, 2002 09:06 AMSorry - 'Mankiw'. Just in case there's a guy named 'Makiw'.
Posted by: Barry on December 20, 2002 09:07 AMMankiw did indeed support Bush plans on taxes, antitrust, and other key platforms. See http://post.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/mankiw/columns/nov00.html
for his explanation of why he was voting for Bush against Gore.
Of course, that's how you get one of these appointments, isn't it.
Posted by: A Shenfeld on December 20, 2002 09:53 AMA Shenfeld, thanks for the link. Supports my thesis that most, if not all, highly visible economists are right-wingers. I'd heard some things about Mankiw that lead me to suspect he was center or center-right, but the page you linked to paints quite a stark picture.
Your statement Of course, that's how you get one of these appointments, isn't it is far too charitable. Maybe Mankiw really voted for Bush because he actually believes the stupidities he uttered on the page you linked.
Best,
Best,
Posted by: Stephen J Fromm on December 20, 2002 10:04 AM"thanks for the link. Supports my thesis that most, if not all, highly visible economists are right-wingers"
You are at the site of a highly visible economist who is not a right-winger.
Most? Possibly. Thankfull not ALL.
Greg Mankiw is a conservative Republican, which simply means doing the bidding of conservative Republican constituents. Happy the wealthy.
Posted by: on December 20, 2002 11:42 AMKen,
Look at the Nobel Prize. Or the constant harping, which comes from centrist economists too (AFAIK), about disincentive effects of marginal income tax rates even at very high incomes. Or...well, it's a long list.
Best,
Posted by: Stephen J Fromm on December 20, 2002 11:44 AM